The Marketing Innovation Blog

It's no longer marketing as usual.

Is Chatroulette a Platform for Marketers?

Published on March 10th, 2010 by griffinyorkkrause

Recently, internet users all over the globe have been fascinated by the Web’s latest hit, Chatroulette.

Like a mix of StumbleUpon, Skype, and YouTube, Chatroulette randomly pairs you with another video chatter from anywhere on the planet. Spend five minutes on Chatroulette and you will come across all types of people- men, women, children, singles, groups of friends on one screen, public figures, and some of the strangest characters the Internet has to offer. Once users have been paired, either side can click “Next” to spin the imaginary roulette wheel and instantly be partnered face to face with someone new.

Naturally this new phenomenon has many marketers and brands wondering how they can take advantage of the platform. Here are a few considerations:

1) An important aspect of advertising and sponsorship is associating your name with a positive experience. Often marketers will link their names to hit shows, music, events and personalities. Chatroulette does not fall in any of these buckets. While many people enjoy the experience of using the site, some are disgusted by the high level of weirdness, nudity, and insults on the site. Realize that you will be right there alongside some very questionable and inappropriate material if you chose to participate. It may not be an experience that you want associated with your brand.

2) Some may be tempted to stream TV style ads on repeat, but this may not be worth the time or effort. Unlike TV, there is no way to target specific demographics. Chatroulette is completely random in assignments and users come from all over the globe, making geography another challenge. In addition, streaming content would not capitalize on the “chat” aspect of Chatroulette. Users expect to connect and interact with people, therefore anything other than that would be considered interruption advertising.

3) Product placement is another way brands and marketers may think they can benefit from Chatroulette, but again this is not the best platform for that type of marketing. By design, you can only reach one person at a time on Chatroulette. Sites such as UStream.tv allow for large audiences to tune into one channel, which would be a much better location for a celebrity endorsement or product placement. On Chatroulette, you are just as likely to come across Joe Schmo as you are Joe Montana. There are many rumors of celebrities on Chatroulette, but this POST by Vayner Media shows that most are fakes.

Many enhancements could be made to Chatroulette and the platform will certainly evolve. However, until it is possible to narrow down the audience you will chat with, it is not a great choice for most brands. The only viable player at this stage may be a large, multinational brand interested in casting a very wide net. In this case they could run a contest or tie their activity on Chatroulette to another platform to extend the experience. Even this would be very difficult to control, so in my mind Chatroulette is currently a tool best reserved for personal use.

Do you have any ideas on how Chatroulette could be used by marketers?

Tim Allan is an intern with GY&K.  He is currently a full-time student at Plymouth State University, graduating this spring with a major in Business Administration.

Using Cell Phones to Deposit Checks

Published on March 5th, 2010 by griffinyorkkrause

As customers are becoming more tech-savvy, banking technology is being developed to make life for those customers more convenient. Currently, some can deposit checks in ATMs without filling out a deposit slip, and pretty soon customers will be able to deposit their checks from any and everywhere! As a matter of fact, I was amused when I went to deposit a check in the ATM machine at my bank and I did not have to fill out one of those awful, time consuming deposit slips. How convenient, right? 

If I thought that was amazing, you can only imagine what I think about the following. According to USAToday.com, in the near future, bank customers will be able to deposit checks by taking a picture of the front and back of the check with their cell phones. I usually do not have to visit my bank very often because I have direct deposit. But there are certain times like during Christmas or my birthday when depositing checks via cell phone would make my life that much more hassle free. As long as the picture of the check being sent is clear, and one does not immediately receive a bad image error message, funds will be transferred and deposited almost instantly. This type of banking service would be a dream come true! Especially for people like myself who are trying to balance their hectic schedules and who barely have time for themselves, never mind making a trip to the bank.

But, would sending this data from our cell phones to the bank compromise our financial privacy and security? Many are fearful of technology when it involves personal financial information because identity theft is such a huge problem. However, banks say that they have overcome those concerns and they add that all of the personal financial data that is sent from a phone will be encrypted as it travels to the bank.

With new technology emerging, we all have hesitations. At the same time, one must embrace technological change to reap the benefits of a more convenient lifestyle. There is always a chance of fraud when it comes to financial and personal data in the banking industry. With that being said, I would definitely choose to take advantage of this service because it would give me more time to do things that I enjoy doing—and going to the bank is not one of them!

Would you participate in this service, or would you feel safer and find it easier to just visit your local bank?

Jenaleigh Landers is an intern with Griffin York & Krause.  She is currently a full-time Business Major at Saint Anselm College.

Still Buzzing – Do we really want to combine our email with updates from our social networks?

Published on February 24th, 2010 by griffinyorkkrause

From Google Earth and Gmail to GOOG-411 and Nexus One it is clear that its wide range of products and service offerings have molded Google into one of the most dominant companies on the Web.  As if Google wasn’t already a huge threat, it developed Google Buzz.  As you’ve probably heard, or experienced, Google’s new development aims to combine the best features of different social networking sites like Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, Picasa and YouTube, sending many of those sites scrambling to re-examine their features to make sure Google Buzz does not become a monopoly in the social media space next.

So, what supposedly makes Google Buzz more appealing than Facebook, Twitter and other social networking sites? Well, according to an article in Channelweb, the top reasons are that Google Buzz:

  1. Integrates with Gmail
  2. Drowns out the noise
  3. Cuts out the hunting and pecking
  4. Works well with cell phones

Ok, so do you want to know what this really means?  To start, Gmail users will now have access to all of their status updates, photos, new comments and other content mixed in with their email.  Cool?  Not so much.  Do we social networking fanatics really want ALL of our updates mixed in with email?  I think this will make emailing and social networking more of a hassle.

Google claims Buzz will “drown out the noise,” by using algorithms and history to sift through unwanted status updates or photo uploads based on a user’s previous activity.  Yes, I do not want to know what Friend A is doing every second of the day, but that doesn’t mean that I never want to know what he’s up to.  Google Buzz also has an “auto-follow” feature where all of your previous Gmail contacts can automatically connect with you.  Imagine all of the people that you email:  your parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, coworkers and children.  Is this option really preferable?  Well, if you are a fan of Google Buzz so far, AND if you are an Apple or Android user—don’t worry.  Google has developed mobile applications for the iPhone and Google Android.  Google is also developing an enterprise plan for Buzz.

Yes, Google Buzz compiles email and social networking content all into one program, but should this really make Facebook and Twitter that worried?  I would rather keep social networking separate from emailing.  It is quite clear that Google can do it all, but is Buzz really going to attract current Facebook and Twitter users?

Jenaleigh Landers is an intern with Griffin York & Krause.  She is currently a full-time Business Major at Saint Anselm College.

Best of 2009 Podcast

Published on February 22nd, 2010 by Ben

The Aughts are behind us and the Theater of Public Influence is sending them off in style.  In this episode, we take a look back at the decade that was and see just how far we’ve come in the past ten years.  Then its off to the red carpet for our 2nd annual year-end awards show.  We’ve surveyed the internet to determine 2009’s best and buzz-worthiest in a number of categories including movies, music, TV, gadgets, news stories, print and TV ads, online presence and Marketer of the Year.  Listen to find out who this year’s winners were and let us know if you agree.

Listen | Subscribe

Why Sesame Street is So Smart

Published on February 17th, 2010 by Holly

I’m a huge Sesame Street fan. I remember coming home from morning kindergarten and wolfing down my lunch so I could watch the show at noontime sharp. It was THAT good.

And it still is. I have a one-year-old son whose head does a 180 when a chorus of children gleefully singing “Sunny day, sweepin’ the clouds away…” bursts out of the TV. He’ll stare, mouth agape, at the colorful puppet characters for a good five minutes as they interact with him through the screen. Yes, five minutes. Hey, that’s a LOT to a toddler.

There are a myriad of reasons Sesame Street has thrived over the 40 years it has been in production. For one, they’re not afraid of change and they keep up with the times. Elmo knows how to surf the web. Miles shoots a video for a school project. They’ve even updated the theme song to a catchy little ditty. But they also know when classic characters should stay put. Everyone knows who Big Bird, Ernie, and Grover are. Heck, even Gordon, Maria, Linda and Bob, the NON-puppets, are still “living” there! And they stick with core values that are reinforced in every preschool, nursery and elementary school, while incorporating different cultures, and people of different races and abilities.

But beyond those reasons, Sesame Street has been a master at incorporating technology in a very smart way. Their web site is easy to use and encourages learning with interactive games and allows parents and children to personalize their very own “My Street” site. The site is an extension of the show, and changes daily to reflect the daily show’s theme – featuring the letter of the day as well as videos of the day. There are even Sesame Street iPhone aps, a lifesaver for parents who need to keep their children entertained while waiting at a restaurant or in line in the grocery store. Who doesn’t want to help Elmo create a monster on “Elmo’s Monster Maker?”

What Sesame Street does NOT do is incorporate product placement in their episodes. Although it is a show that needs corporate funding to stay afloat, I don’t know if I have EVER seen a brand-name product mentioned or strategically placed in a scene. I remember reading a Mommy blogger complain that a character delivered Pampers, instead of plain diapers, to Gina the veterinarian on one episode. I’m not sure if that was an oversight on the producers’ parts, but some people were offended. Really. There must be a reason, though, that Sesame Street does NOT use trademarked products (something to do with the public broadcasting piece of this pie, perhaps?). Would it make a difference if it did? Obviously they have sponsors like American Greetings and Earth’s Best Organic Baby Food, but I usually see that in a form of a PSA or commercial before the episode airs. Interesting.

So, congratulations Sesame Street for creating a program that has been more than just a children’s show for 40 years: You have successfully put meaning into television. Here’s hoping for another 40 more… at least.

Depp Charge

Published on February 12th, 2010 by Kevin

I just found out that People magazine’s Sexiest Man Alive has bought real estate in my zip code and my wife is all a twitter about it.

“Pirates of the Caribbean” star Johnny Depp has reportedly purchased a house for his parents in the same NH town in which I live.  Depp had been seen scouting the state recently looking for homes.  While Depp won’t be the primary resident of the house, it’s safe to assume that the box office star and 3-time Academy Award nominee will be visiting from time to time.

The idea of a chance meeting with Depp at the corner market or public library has Rebecca, my wife, excited beyond comfortable measure.  She’s fully declared that if she and Johnny hit it off, that I’ll be returning our recent wedding gifts to Crate and Barrel.

Of course, having to choose between the world’s two sexiest men (who? Me, of course.  Who else would I be talking about?) is a difficult decision for any woman.  But I have no doubt that while she would swoon at the sight of Edward Scissorhands at the fresh fruit stand, she will always be mine.

We know competition can be a good thing for our businesses: it makes us refocus on what we do well.  But can competition be good for our customers too (aside from the price question)?  In other words, does “shop elsewhere first, come to us last” work if you have faith in your product or service?

In the meantime, I’ll be busy locking my doors and watching out for men dressed like pirates, mad hatters, or demon barbers.

The Kindle Innovates in Print

Published on February 9th, 2010 by Brady

As we wait to get our hands on the new Apple iPad, it’s interesting to see how some of the existing players in the tablet space are marketing themselves. 

Recently I came across a very cool magazine ad for the Amazon Kindle.  I was reading an article in Forbes that started on one page and actually ended on a Kindle.  Well, not a real Kindle but an ad for one.  This was really clever and I have to thank Sanjay Parekh for posting a picture of it here. 

It’s ironic that one of the most innovative magazine ads I’ve seen in a while promotes a device that many feel will eventually kill the traditional print platform.

Best of 2009 Survey

Published on February 5th, 2010 by Brady

It’s that time again (alright, it’s actually about 3 weeks past that time, but who’s counting).  Our GY&K podcast, the Theater of Public Influence, is getting set to record our 2nd annual “Best of the Year” Episode.  This is where we take a look at all the things creating buzz in the past year and decide what things had the biggest impact.  The podcast team has pulled together some nominees in each category but now we need your help. Please take a minute to fill out the survey posted here:

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N2DSCLM and cast your votes.  It only takes a minute and you’ll be helping us present more accurate results.  We want to get as many responses as possible so feel free to pass email this along to friends, post the link on Facebook, Tweet about it, stop random people in the street, hire a skywriter, etc.  But most importantly, take a minute to vote yourself.

Voting Criteria

This poll is a little different than your typical “best of” list because (at least for the entertainment categories) we’re less concerned with what you liked the most and more concerned with what you think had the biggest impact, created the most buzz, had the widest reach, etc.  So think about that as you cast your votes.  Don’t like our nominations? No problem, there’s a write-in option in each category.

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N2DSCLM

Will You Pay For The Online News?

Published on January 25th, 2010 by griffinyorkkrause

It’s no secret that the newspaper industry has been suffering. Now that everyone has access to the Web where they can get the latest news with a click of a computer mouse or a fingertip touch on a smartphone, long ago are the days of waiting for your paper to find out what’s going on in the world.

But the newspapers are smartening up. Or are they?

Just as you have to pay your 50 cents per copy or a fixed rate for a subscription to your physical paper, some popular newspapers are charging, or will soon start charging, readers to pay to read the news… off their Web site. The latest medium to do this is the New York Times. Although the Times Co. has released few details of how they plan to charge readers, we do know that starting in 2011, the newspaper will offer a “metered plan” where viewers can look at a certain number of articles free before having to pay to continue to read more. The Wall Street Journal and The Financial Times already have this practice in place.

It’s easy to draw the conclusion that media companies are doing this because advertising spending is not where it used to be. With production costs on the rise, and in order to keep some of these outlets afloat, now the cost burden needs to be shifted to the consumer. But will readership suffer as a result? Or will readers go to one of the thousands of competitors that is not charging a fee to view content? Then would the pay-to-read plan ultimately backfire?

Are you willing to pay for YOUR news?

Merging Print and Digital

Published on January 15th, 2010 by Brady

In a recent post we looked at the hype surrounding the new Apple tablet and the evolution of print media.  In the November Wired Magazine, there was an entire page dedicated to interactive advertisements, including a description of how to interact with select ads in that issue.   Anyone with an iPhone or Android-supported mobile device could download the free kooaba app and then receive instant product information by taking a picture of specific ads. 

I decided to download the app and give it a shot.  I started by snapping a picture of the Microsoft Office ad.  The app then verified the Microsoft ad and presented a few different options.  In this case it was tell a friend or watch a video.  I was a bit underwhelmed. 

Next I tried an ad for Victorinox Swiss Army knives.  This time there were many more choices.  In addition to the tell a friend option, I could Call the Victorinox Swiss Army (linking directly to the phone number), Send an E-mail to Victorinox, Buy Now (opened their Web site), Digg This, Reddit This, Twitter About This or Visit Website.  At this point I wondered why Microsoft didn’t give me the same options to connect through social networks or find more information. 

After trying a few more and getting mixed results, I felt like some brands really “got it” while others completely missed the opportunity. 

The lesson for marketers is to think through the user experience on any new platform you’re committing to even if it’s just a test.    

Since traditional magazines will probably be around for a bit longer, I’m sure we’ll see more attempts like this to engage readers with ads.  Augmented reality will certainly play a role and we’re likely to see much more of this technology used in 2010. 

How do you see magazine advertising evolving? 

Here’s a video of the kooba app in action.  This time the user is interested in learning more about a movie poster – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wysfEM6YgCM